News linked to both this project and an event.
According to Lookonchain monitoring, Pump.fun deposited 174,408 SOL (approximately $14.76 million) into Kraken 13 hours ago. Concurrently, on-chain transaction data suggests it may have completed partial sell-offs: a newly created wallet (35qaEz) withdrew 117,877 SOL (approximately $9.96 million) from Kraken, subsequently selling all of them at around $84.52 each for approximately $9.96 million USDC, and then redeposited the USDC back into Kraken.
According to on-chain analytics platform Lookonchain (@lookonchain), Pump.fun has resumed selling SOL after a 9-month hiatus, depositing 174,408 SOL (approximately $14.76 million) into Kraken. Of this amount, 117,877 SOL—reportedly sold via a newly created wallet (35qaEz)—was exchanged for approximately $9.96 million in USDC at an average price of $84.52 per SOL and subsequently deposited back into the exchange. Previously, between May 2024 and August 2025, Pump.fun had sold a cumulative total of 4.19 million SOL, amounting to roughly $757 million at an average price of $181 per SOL.
According to chart analysis released by independent analyst Markus Thielen on May 19, the current market capitalization of USDT has reached $189.8 billion, while that of USDC stands at $76.9 billion—both exhibiting long-term upward trends. However, since Bitcoin entered a correction phase in October last year, the total market capitalization of stablecoins has remained largely flat, indicating relatively limited inflows of new capital into the crypto market. Thielen noted that although there is a widespread belief that stablecoins will fully replace traditional payment networks, their primary use cases remain concentrated on crypto trading and portfolio management—still far from achieving mainstream payment adoption. While U.S. policy broadly supports stablecoin development—partly because their reserve assets are often reallocated into U.S. Treasury securities—the gap between current usage and true mainstream payment application remains substantial.
According to on-chain analyst Ai Aunt (@ai_9684xtpa), a “smart money” address—previously accumulating 11,004 ETH at an average price of $3.45 in 2016 and ultimately realizing $30.38 million in profit—has been aggressively buying ETH on-chain over the past three days. Just 10 hours ago, this address purchased another 1,344.18 ETH (approximately $2.83 million). Its total accumulation over the past three days now stands at 6,627.79 ETH, valued at roughly $14.276 million. The average entry price for this newly accumulated portion is $2,153.95, resulting in a current unrealized loss of approximately $165,000; all on-chain USDC has been fully deployed into this accumulation.
Goldman Sachs’ Q1 2026 13F filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) shows a significant reduction in its holdings of crypto asset ETFs: it has fully exited all XRP-related ETFs and all Solana ETFs offered by Grayscale, Bitwise, and Fidelity. Its Bitcoin ETF holdings still include approximately $690 million in BlackRock’s IBIT and roughly $25 million in Fidelity’s FBTC—both down about 10% quarter-over-quarter. Ethereum ETF holdings declined more sharply: its position in the iShares Ethereum ETF (ETHA) was cut by approximately 70%, leaving about $114 million. Additionally, Goldman Sachs increased its stakes in Circle, Galaxy Digital, Coinbase, Robinhood, and PayPal during the same period, while reducing positions in Strategy and Riot Platforms.
Goldman Sachs significantly reduced its crypto ETF exposure in the first quarter of 2026 and has completely exited its holdings in XRP and Solana-related ETFs.Filings show that in the fourth quarter of 2025, Goldman Sachs held approximately $154 million in XRP-related ETFs, including products from Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, Grayscale, and 21Shares, making it one of the largest institutional holders of XRP ETFs at the time. Additionally, the firm previously held Solana-related ETFs such as the Grayscale Solana Trust ETF, Bitwise Solana Staking ETF, and Fidelity Solana Fund, all of which have now been fully sold off.However, Goldman Sachs still retains substantial holdings in BTC and ETH ETFs. Specifically, it holds approximately $690 million in BlackRock's IBIT and about $25 million in Fidelity's FBTC, though both positions were reduced by roughly 10% compared to the previous quarter. Meanwhile, its holding in BlackRock's ETHA shrank by about 70%, leaving approximately 7.2 million shares valued at around $114 million.Furthermore, Goldman Sachs increased its holdings in crypto-related stocks such as Circle, Galaxy Digital, Coinbase, Robinhood, and PayPal, while reducing positions in mining and infrastructure companies like Strategy, Bit Digital, Riot Platforms, and IREN. (Cointelegraph)
B.AI has officially integrated into the Solana ecosystem, comprehensively upgrading its cross-chain login and payment capabilities. Users can now log in with one click via MetaMask and Phantom wallets and top up or subscribe using SOL, USDT, USDC, or WBTC on the Solana network. B.AI now supports eight major public blockchains—TRON, BNB Chain, Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and Solana—building a more open and decentralized multi-chain AI economy. New users enjoy an exclusive limited-time welcome offer: 500,000 points upon first login, a 1:1 bonus on top-ups, and up to an additional $100 worth of points per user. Going forward, B.AI will lower entry barriers and expand asset options to help you seamlessly enter the new era of intelligent economics.
that, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, the ShapeShift mystery whale spent 5.68 million USDC to purchase 2,656 ETH, and currently holds 129,667 ETH, worth $274.78 million.
Odaily Odaily News According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi's monitoring, a whale who previously purchased 11,004 ETH in 2016 at an average price of $3.45, realizing a profit of $30.38 million, has restocked ETH after a year. One hour ago, the whale bought 647.137 ETH on-chain at an average price of $2,211.49, worth $1.43 million. The address still has 14.19 million USDC available.
Odaily Chainalysis posted on X platform, stating that prior to the THORChain theft, wallets suspected to be linked to the attacker had been transferring funds through Monero, Hyperliquid, and THORChain for several consecutive weeks. As early as late April, the attacker-associated wallets deposited funds into Hyperliquid positions via Hyperliquid and the Monero privacy bridge. These funds were subsequently converted to USDC and transferred to Arbitrum, then bridged to Ethereum. Some of the ETH was then moved to THORChain to stake as RUNE for a newly joined node, which is believed to be the source of the attack.Subsequently, the attacker bridged a portion of the RUNE back to Ethereum and split it into four chains. One chain went directly to the attacker, passing through intermediate wallets before transferring 8 ETH to the wallet that would ultimately receive the stolen funds, just 43 minutes before the attack. The funds from the other three chains flowed in reverse. Between May 14 and 15, these wallets bridged the ETH back to Arbitrum again, deposited it into Hyperliquid, and transferred it into Monero via the same privacy bridge, with the final transaction occurring less than 5 hours before the attack commenced. As of Friday afternoon, the stolen funds remain untouched, but the attacker has demonstrated sophisticated cross-chain money laundering capabilities. The Hyperliquid to Monero path may be the next move.
According to on-chain analyst Onchain Lens (@OnchainLens), a whale address (0xfda5...974d2) sold 7,557 ETH at $2,225 per ETH, receiving approximately 16.815 million USDC in return.
According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi monitoring, a certain address has now opened a 10x leveraged short position of 300,000 HYPE, valued at $13.2 million, with an average opening price of $43.398 and an unrealized loss of $187,000. The address deposited 8.825 million USDC as margin to Hyperliquid an hour and a half ago, with a historical cumulative profit of $5.965 million.
that, according to on-chain analyst Ember Monitoring, following news that the CME and the New York Stock Exchange have jointly pushed US regulators to strengthen oversight of Hyperliquid, HYPE has retraced 4% from $45 to $43. An address named asssdfc transferred 8.826 million USDC to Hyperliquid 20 minutes ago after the news broke to short HYPE. It has already opened a $7 million short position on HYPE with an entry price of $43.1 and is still increasing its short position.
according to Lookonchain monitoring, after being dormant for a month, a whale deposited 8.8 million USDC into Hyperliquid and opened a 10x leveraged short position on 175,082 HYPE, worth $7.62 million. The whale is continuing to add to their short position on HYPE.
according to Lookonchain monitoring, a whale deposited 7.26 million USDC into Hyperliquid and placed limit orders through multiple wallets to buy HYPE at prices ranging from $30.88 to $35.88. Another address deposited 2.43 million USDC into Hyperliquid and bought 62,200 HYPE, worth $2.43 million.
According to on-chain analyst Ai Aunt (@ai9684xtpa), venture capital firm No Limit Holdings is expected to accumulate $2.5 million worth of HYPE at prices ranging from $31.88 to $35.88. The address 0x4c6…e015a deposited $7.26 million in USDC to Hyperliquid half an hour ago; of this, $4.76 million in USDC has already been transferred to four addresses, while the remaining funds are being used to place buy orders for HYPE. The current price of HYPE is $38.60.
according to Onchain Lens monitoring, whale qianbaidu.eth (0x9bb...7a1) sold 338,084 HYPE in the past 48 hours, exchanging them for 13.4 million USDC at an average price of $39.65; its staking address (0x831...b42) still holds 151,573 HYPE, worth $5.89 million.
According to on-chain analyst Onchain Lens (@OnchainLens), a whale deposited 2 million USDC into HyperLiquid and further increased its SP500 short position. The current notional value of this position is approximately $37.67 million, with 7x leverage. Data shows that the address is currently experiencing an unrealized loss exceeding $2.19 million, with a liquidation price of $8,104.85.
According to The Block, Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, noted that three enterprise-grade blockchains—Arc (by Circle), Canton Network, and Tempo (by Stripe)—have collectively raised over $1 billion in funding recently. All three funding rounds occurred after the signing of the GENIUS Act in July 2025. Hougan believes this legislation broke a prior regulatory stalemate that had discouraged institutional capital from entering the space. Hougan identified three key signals: First, all three blockchains prioritize native privacy-preserving transactions as a core design feature, addressing institutions’ need for transaction confidentiality. Second, the implementation of the GENIUS Act has significantly reduced regulatory uncertainty; the next critical variable is the pending Clarity Act, from which stablecoins and tokenization infrastructure stand to benefit. Third, these blockchains are backed by top-tier institutions—including Goldman Sachs, Citadel, BlackRock, Stripe, and Visa—marking a stark contrast to Ethereum and Solana, which emerged from grassroots origins. Hougan stated that his firm’s capital remains primarily allocated to native crypto projects, and he believes these emerging enterprise chains will raise the overall competitive bar and attract additional capital inflows.
According to on-chain analyst Ai Aunt (@ai9684xtpa), 45 minutes ago, GMGN’s fee-related address 0x38d…23866 deposited 3,000 BNB—worth approximately $2.04 million—into Pionex, likely for fee settlement. This marks the first time in two months that this address has transferred fee funds to the exchange. The address currently holds approximately $12.45 million worth of BNB, ETH, and USDC.