News linked to this event type.
According to on-chain analyst Blockaid (@blockaid_), the well-known Ethereum MEV bot JaredFromSubway (@jaredsmev) has been attacked, resulting in losses of approximately $7.5 million. The attacker constructed a deceptive MEV arbitrage path to trick the bot into automatically approving token transfers. Leveraging these open approvals—before they were revoked—the attacker drained WETH, USDC, and USDT from the bot’s contract. The stolen funds ultimately flowed to the attacker’s wallet address. Blockaid noted that this attack was not a conventional phishing attempt or smart contract vulnerability, but rather a targeted exploitation of the bot’s automated execution mechanism.
according to Hyperbot data, the whale "pension-usdt.eth" has just opened another 3x leveraged ETH short position and is continuously increasing its position. The address currently holds 8,364.3629 ETH, with a position value of approximately $14.5 million.
据链上分析师 Ai 姨监测，地址 0x770…399f2 曾在 04.14 当时行情的上涨起点，以均价 71655 美元买入 112.86 WBTC，价值 808 万美元，一度在五月中旬浮盈超百万，但坚持拿住，终于在 06.16 和 7 小时前分批清仓，卖出价格 64723 美元，持仓两月资产缩水 10%。
According to Lookonchain monitoring, 7 hours ago, a whale spent 16.55 million USDC to purchase 234,898 SOL at an average price of $70.5.
Odaily, "White-Haired Stock Guru" Serenity posted on X, reviewing his past experiences where his investment views faced skepticism. He stated that many original investment ideas initially face strong opposition, but ultimately the market becomes the standard for judging right and wrong. He has faced significant criticism for being bullish on several companies, for example:$AXTI: Early on, it was questioned as a "scam company," and related discussions even led to a ban from Reddit's WSB forum. However, it later received coverage from Reuters, and the performance of the Indium Phosphide (InP) substrate industry company, along with institutional investor validation, confirmed its logic.$RPI: Initially labeled a "meme stock" by the market, analysts believed it lacked fundamentals. However, earnings reports showed the company's future revenue growth expectation reached 58%, and it was subsequently re-evaluated as a high-growth AI hardware company.$SIVE: Once considered a "meme stock" by numerous investors, it later gained institutional buying support, including attention from Fidelity Research, JPMorgan Chase, and others, and announced partnerships with companies like Jabil and GlobalFoundries.Serenity stated, "The market will ultimately decide what is right or wrong, not the angry comments or posts on X (formerly Twitter)." He added that as each investment thesis gets validated one by one, the eventual market performance overshadows the early noise. He also listed several other cases that were initially doubted but later gained market recognition, including:$AAOI: Near $30, management was questioned as "untrustworthy";$LITE: At $300, the photonics industry was considered to be in a bubble;$RKLB: At $20, it was dismissed as just a low-revenue launch company;$HOOD: At $20, it faced negative sentiment due to the GameStop trading restriction incident;$IQE: Considered just a small UK company lacking partnerships in the photonics field;$SOI: Analysts at a European bank considered its valuation too high;$NBIS: Questioned for having no competitive moat;$INTC: The market thought it couldn't compete with TSMC;$MRVL: The market feared its ASIC market share would be taken by Broadcom;$AEHR: The market misinterpreted its earnings report, thinking the company lacked revenue;$EWY: The market believed the South Korean semiconductor cycle was in a bubble.
According to Odaily, the privacy-focused public chain project Namada officially stated that the protocol encountered a vulnerability attack incident. The team is currently investigating and has contacted relevant parties to assist in handling the matter.Officials stated that if the operator behind this attack is a white hat hacker, they hope the individual will proactively contact the team to further understand the vulnerability and facilitate a resolution.On-chain data shows that some ATOM assets related to the incident were allegedly transferred to a Cosmos Hub network address via IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication protocol). According to on-chain tracking information, this address received approximately 228,517 ATOM on June 18. The funds were subsequently drained within hours through IBC transfers and multiple outgoing transactions. Currently, only a small balance remains in this address.As of now, Namada has not disclosed the type of vulnerability, the attack method, or the specific scale of losses. The relevant investigation is still ongoing.
Rising exchange supply, insufficient new participation, and declining futures activity have led Ethereum analysts to anticipate a fresh wave of selling pressure pushing ETH below $1,700. Crypto analyst Pelin Ay noted that approximately 57,700 ETH net flowed into Binance over the past few days—a large inflow into exchanges often signals potential selling.
Odaily News Alex Svanevik, CEO of on-chain analytics platform Nansen, stated that when enterprises begin effectively using Chinese large language models, the bubble in the AI industry may burst. While the U.S. regulatory environment could limit this process, the overall trend remains that Chinese models are continuously becoming more efficient, capable of running on non-cutting-edge hardware, while global GPU supply (including non-Nvidia chips) is increasing.Alex Svanevik also pointed out that the recent decline in H100 and H200 GPU rental prices reflects a shift in the supply-demand structure of computing power. He raised the question of how to interpret the market signal of declining GPU rental prices. As model efficiency improves alongside expanding computing power supply, the AI infrastructure market may be entering a phase of repricing.
Analysis shows that Hyperliquid achieves extremely high efficiency under the “protocol-level infrastructure” model: revenue is nearly equivalent to net profit, and operating costs are close to minimal, reflecting a structural characteristic where “revenue does not scale linearly with headcount.” However, this current advantage exists at a stage where regulatory and compliance costs have not yet been fully realized; should compliance pressures increase in the future, profitability may contract.
CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju stated that the phenomenon of capital flowing from Bitcoin to altcoins, which once drove altcoin market trends, has largely disappeared.He pointed out that since 2021, the trading volume of altcoins paired against BTC has significantly shrunk, and the market structure has undergone notable changes.Ki Young Ju believes that the era where "a rise in Bitcoin leads to a broad rally in altcoins" may have ended. In the future, altcoins may rely more on their own fundamentals, use cases, and independent capital inflows to drive price increases.
Odaily reports, according to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, Chainlink's quarterly unlock occurred 3 hours ago, with 21 million LINK unlocked and transferred out from four Chainlink non-circulating supply addresses, worth $166 million. Among them, 18.375 million LINK, worth $145 million, were transferred to Binance, while 2.625 million LINK, worth $20.8 million, were transferred to the 0xD50...8Af multi-signature address. Each quarter, Chainlink's non-circulating supply addresses unlock approximately 10 million to 20 million LINK, with the majority transferred to Binance and a smaller portion to the 0xD50...8Af address. The LINK transferred to this address partially enters the LINK staking reward distribution contract, used to distribute rewards to LINK stakers.
according to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale deposited 5,900 ETH (worth $10.03 million) into Kraken, incurring a loss of $9.8 million. The whale had previously withdrawn 22,951 ETH (worth $48.95 million) from Kraken and currently still holds 17,051 ETH (worth $29.11 million).
According to Onchain Lens monitoring, a newly created wallet address withdrew 8,450 ETH from FalconX, valued at $14.4 million. Yesterday, this whale withdrew 108,000 HYPE from FalconX, worth $7.3 million.
Odaily Aave, a DeFi lending protocol, successfully maintained operations after experiencing capital outflows totaling approximately $8.45 billion. However, the incident has simultaneously triggered renewed market discussion regarding its risk structure and the fragility of the DeFi system.This stress event originated from a vulnerability exploit on the KelpDAO rsETH cross-chain bridge in April 2026, resulting in the theft of approximately $292 million in assets. This triggered market concerns over the safety of rsETH collateral. As this asset was widely used as collateral on Aave, panic spread rapidly, leading to concentrated withdrawals by users.During the capital outflow process, liquidity in certain lending markets was quickly depleted, with utilization rates briefly approaching 100%. Aave managed the situation by adjusting risk parameters and activating emergency mechanisms, although localized withdrawal restrictions did occur.Nevertheless, Aave's core smart contracts were not compromised. Protocol founder Stani Kulechov stated that the event validated the system's stability and resilience under extreme stress conditions.However, analysts pointed out that this incident exposed structural risks within DeFi: high coupling of assets across protocols, reliance on external bridged assets for collateral, and the potential for liquidity to rapidly evaporate in extreme scenarios.Industry observers believe that while DeFi's "composability" enhances efficiency, it also accelerates risk transmission, potentially causing a single asset event to trigger systemic cascading effects. Although Aave successfully navigated this stress test, the outcome does not equate to the elimination of risk.Overall, this event is viewed as a genuine extreme stress test for the DeFi lending system: the system can function, but its stability remains highly dependent on the quality of external assets and the market liquidity environment. (Cointelegraph)
According to on-chain analytics platform Lookonchain, the trader pension-usdt.eth has closed all 60,000 ETH short positions, with the position size valued at approximately $100 million at the time of closure and locking in roughly $5.8 million in profits. This marks the trader’s 23rd consecutive profitable trade, bringing cumulative profits to over $41 million.
Odaily reports, according to Lookonchain monitoring, today the U.S. Bitcoin ETF experienced a net outflow of 1,786 BTC, with a 7-day net outflow of 2,986 BTC; the Ethereum ETF saw a net outflow of 14,515 ETH, with a 7-day net outflow of 9,913 ETH.
Ventuals posted on X platform, stating that the HIP-3 decentralized exchange has been fully shut down, and the vHYPE withdrawal process has now been initiated. The approximately 380,775 HYPE tokens that were previously in the queue have been processed around 10:00 AM Eastern Time today, and all previously submitted vHYPE withdrawal requests have been included in this batch.According to the rules, users can claim HYPE 7.5 days after the processing is completed, which is expected to be available from approximately 10:00 PM Eastern Time on June 26.
According to on-chain analyst EmberCN, a whale has today liquidated its position of 1,105 BTC, held for 7 months, valued at $69.43 million, incurring a loss of $26.9 million. Between November last year and February this year, the whale had withdrawn these BTC from Binance and OKX at an average price of $87,181. Today, the whale transferred all these BTC back to Binance, realizing a loss of $26.9 million.
according to on-chain analyst Ai Yi's monitoring, an address (0xF42…f2b51) associated with F2Pool co-founder Wang Chun appears to be building a position in ETH and WBTC. In the past 4 hours, this address withdrew 7,650 ETH and 124.18 WBTC from Binance, with a total value of $20.666 million, and has now deposited them into Spark.
on-chain security researcher Specter posted on X, stating that THORChain has not resumed normal operations for over a month after suspending all transactions due to a security vulnerability incident. The protocol previously did not choose to suspend transactions during other security incidents or suspicious fund flows; it even continued operating simple ETH-BTC paths. However, after becoming the affected party this time, it completely halted cross-chain transactions, sparking community discussion about the consistency of its risk management. Currently, THORChain on-chain trading remains completely stagnant, with almost no transactions on the entire chain. The recovery timeline remains unclear, and Specter reminds community users to "stay alert."